Points and Articles
All content on this website is under copyright and may not be reproduced in any way shape or form with out written permission from
                                                        Mickey Burrow Paranormal Investigations Copyright 2010
Out of the corner of my eye
 Things aren't always as they seem
 By Mickey Burrow (4/2010) 
     
      So many times I have come across or heard of stories of people seeing ghosts. Now I am a firm believer in the paranormal and ghosts for that matter. However, some of what people are seeing that can be construed as a ghost or spirit has a valid medical explanation. In so many interviews with many witnesses to ghostly happenings, people time and time again report seeing or catching a glimpse of a ghost or spirit out of the corner of their eye. As uncommon of an occurrence as ghost appearances are, why do they choose to only show us themselves when we aren’t looking? In other words why aren’t people seeing ghosts straight on, or from a frontal view, rather then from the side or out of the corner of their eye? I’m not saying it doesn’t happen because it does, but catching a glimpse from the corner of the eye has an explanation. I know because it caught me off guard too, until I researched it more.
     Now, anyone who has ever had a thorough eye examination will know what I am talking about. (*1) At the back of the eye is what is known as an optic nerve head, or optic disk. In this area of the eye there are no rods or cones, which are the primary light gathering photoreceptors in our eyes. Because there are no rod or cones at the optic nerve head or optic disk this creates a blind spot in our vision. And everyone has one in each eye. Blind spots or normally not noticeable because when both eyes are working in conjunction, the other eye compensates for it with the retina, giving us apparently seamless vision.
Taking these blind spots into perspective, I am going to give you my personal example of how this fooled me into thinking I was seeing something out of the corner of my eye. I recently moved and arranged my living room with a chair in the corner at an angle facing the television. Glancing to the left you can see down my hallway into my children’s bedroom. As I was sitting watching TV one evening, I kept seeing movement out of the corner of my eye at the end of the hallway in the kids’ room. Startled, I went to investigate and found nothing. As I sat back down in the chair I saw the same movement from their room. This movement seemed very consistent and seemed to block out the lamp reflection which was shining down the hall, from just over my left shoulder. As I sat I thought what could it be? I knew it wasn’t paranormal cause of the consistency, and I was able to replicate the movement I was seeing with my positioning in the chair. As I sat and debunked the situation I recalled having a recent eye exam and the eye doctor showing me the blackout area using dark cloth covered wall and a laser pointer. I then began to wonder that maybe this is what people are seeing when they report seeing things out of the corner of their eye. I believe in certain lighting conditions, which I experience in my living room, people can see what appears to be movement in their peripheral vision. Add in a creepy feelings from high surrounding EMF’s, a little mood lighting, and being alone, and boom! You’ve seen a ghost! The mind may even give these temporary blocks of light a human shape, cause that’s what we are use to seeing and expect to see. This is referred to as the Gestalt Theory. But that’s for another discussion another time.
So when an eye witness reports seeing something out of the corner of their eye, you may consider this theory and not take their sighting at face value. Keep this in mind and perhaps this can help explain what has been haunting them.

© Mickey Burrow (4/2010)
(*1 reference:http://www.tedmontgomery.com/the_eye/optcnrve.html)
 
Photographic Paranormal Anomalies Examined
 By Mickey Burrow (7/2010) 
 
     Have you ever taken a photograph of family or friends only to find a strange anomaly appearing in the image? With today’s photographic technology, it’s becoming common place for these “anomalies” to appear in images. Not because of a sophistication or advancement of equipment that can detect such things; but a misunderstanding of how it works.
     Prior to about 1995 and the introduction of the advanced point and shoot camera era, a lot of people generally relied on what little they knew about photography to make an image. Look through the viewfinder, focus, push button, make picture. With the introduction of the microprocessor and advantageous effort to make them part of photography, they were put into point and shoot cameras giving them the ability to auto focus and assess the scene for lighting conditions. People began to put more and more faith in their cameras for making a photograph turn out like a professionally shot image. The mechanics of how this is accomplished has stayed the same, but the method for achieving these images has improved dramatically. Most modern point and shoot cameras are equipped with a dial or user menu settings which allow the user to pick an icon that best describes their shooting situation or subject. If it’s a sport shot… spin the dial to the little running man icon.  If it’s a close up shot… put it on the little flower, etc. And for the most part, these “PHD” (push here dummy) settings work for most shooting scenarios, and people get the results they want or need. These icon settings are mechanically (generally speaking) very similar over all. Meaning: The sports icon will use the same camera settings to produce the image as the macro setting would. Just a difference is the dial or menu is all.  Nothing special is changed in the camera other than the ISO (sensor sensitivity), shutter speed and aperture settings to make the image turn out the way a “professional” would. Example: You are taking a photograph of your child on the soccer field, so you put the camera on the running man (sport) icon. You are essentially telling the camera to pick the highest shutter speed possible to get stop action. The camera will then select a higher ISO setting (if set on auto ISO), open the lens aperture to the widest opening possible, and then select the highest shutter speed to compensate for the light coming in.  Results … stopped motion. And this works for most.
At the other end of the spectrum is a slow shutter speed. When you slow a shutter down you will allow more light to hit the camera sensor. On the camera dial or user menu, the icon is called night shot and is generally denoted with a figure with a star
on the shoulder or some variation. With this setting the camera ISO may be slowed down (if it is on the auto ISO setting), the aperture is narrowed, and the shutter will open longer to compensate for the lack light. This is how it is suppose to work… Example: You photograph friends in front of a Farris wheel and you don’t see the Farris wheel in the back ground, just your friends from the burst of the flash. With this setting you will be able to gather more light from the Farris wheel making it visible in the image after the camera flash has fired. This is achieved by the shutter remaining open longer, letting the back ground light in. One thing owner’s manuals doesn’t  tell you is that it is recommended that you use a tripod when using this setting to hold the camera still until the shutter has closed. Enter the anomalies! 
     The anomalies in some images appear as streaks of light or orbs in mid air with a ghostly comet like tails coming from the back. The streaks of light have definite shape and are well defined as they streak across the image and sometimes pass in front of stationary objects. Ghosts!  No not really. In examining hundreds of these images, I find that because these were
shot at night or indoors, people were using the camera’s night shot mode, like the owner’s manual said to.  But taken without a tripod. With the shutter open the photographer moves before the shutter has closed, resulting in these streaks if light. Take a piece of paper and set it on the table. Now take a pencil and place it on the paper as if to write. Without moving your pencil, pull the paper out from under the pencil tip. You will leave a streak of lead. Same thing with a camera sensor. Only difference is the pencil is replaced with light, and the piece of paper is the camera sensor. Orbs, which are either dust or water vapor in the air, move by nature. So when the camera flash is reflected off of them, or they are back lit by another light source, they take on a comet like motion appearance in the image.
     So some anomalies can at times be explained in photographs. At some point in the future the sophistication of equipment may be able to eliminate these photographic errors, and become sensitive enough to capture real anomalies. Until then we can only look at them and understand how they work and how they are made.